Matter AI | Code Reviewer Documentation

GraphQL Anti-Patterns Overview

Not Using Pagination

# Anti-pattern: Fetching all items without pagination
query GetAllUsers {
  users {
    id
    name
    email
    posts {
      id
      title
      content
      comments {
        id
        text
        author {
          id
          name
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

# Better approach: Use pagination
query GetPaginatedUsers($first: Int!, $after: String) {
  users(first: $first, after: $after) {
    edges {
      node {
        id
        name
        email
      }
      cursor
    }
    pageInfo {
      hasNextPage
      endCursor
    }
  }
}

// Resolver implementation with pagination
const resolvers = {
  Query: {
    users: async (_, { first = 10, after }) => {
      const users = await fetchPaginatedUsers(first, after);
      return {
        edges: users.map(user => ({
          node: user,
          cursor: encodeCursor(user.id)
        })),
        pageInfo: {
          hasNextPage: users.length === first,
          endCursor: users.length ? encodeCursor(users[users.length - 1].id) : null
        }
      };
    }
  }
};

Fetching large collections without pagination can lead to performance issues and timeout errors. Implement cursor-based or offset-based pagination for all list queries.

Overfetching in Resolvers

// Anti-pattern: Overfetching in resolvers
const resolvers = {
  User: {
    posts: async (parent) => {
      // Fetches ALL posts for a user, even if the client only needs a few fields
      return await Post.find({ userId: parent.id });
    }
  }
};

// Better approach: Use dataloader for batching and caching
const postLoader = new DataLoader(async (userIds) => {
  const posts = await Post.find({ userId: { $in: userIds } });
  
  // Group posts by userId
  const postsByUserId = {};
  posts.forEach(post => {
    if (!postsByUserId[post.userId]) {
      postsByUserId[post.userId] = [];
    }
    postsByUserId[post.userId].push(post);
  });
  
  // Return posts in the same order as userIds
  return userIds.map(userId => postsByUserId[userId] || []);
});

const resolvers = {
  User: {
    posts: async (parent) => {
      return await postLoader.load(parent.id);
    }
  }
};

Overfetching in resolvers can lead to N+1 query problems and poor performance. Use DataLoader to batch and cache database queries.

Not Using Proper Authorization

// Anti-pattern: No authorization in resolvers
const resolvers = {
  Query: {
    user: async (_, { id }) => {
      return await User.findById(id);
    }
  },
  Mutation: {
    updateUser: async (_, { id, input }) => {
      const user = await User.findByIdAndUpdate(id, input, { new: true });
      return user;
    }
  }
};

// Better approach: Implement authorization in resolvers
const resolvers = {
  Query: {
    user: async (_, { id }, context) => {
      // Check if user is authenticated
      if (!context.user) {
        throw new AuthenticationError('You must be logged in');
      }
      
      // Check if user has permission to view this user
      if (context.user.id !== id && !context.user.isAdmin) {
        throw new ForbiddenError('You do not have permission to view this user');
      }
      
      return await User.findById(id);
    }
  },
  Mutation: {
    updateUser: async (_, { id, input }, context) => {
      // Check if user is authenticated
      if (!context.user) {
        throw new AuthenticationError('You must be logged in');
      }
      
      // Check if user has permission to update this user
      if (context.user.id !== id && !context.user.isAdmin) {
        throw new ForbiddenError('You do not have permission to update this user');
      }
      
      const user = await User.findByIdAndUpdate(id, input, { new: true });
      return user;
    }
  }
};

Not implementing proper authorization in resolvers can lead to security vulnerabilities. Implement authorization checks in every resolver that accesses sensitive data.

Not Using Input Validation

// Anti-pattern: No input validation
const resolvers = {
  Mutation: {
    createUser: async (_, { input }) => {
      // No validation before creating user
      const user = new User(input);
      await user.save();
      return user;
    }
  }
};

// Better approach: Validate inputs
const resolvers = {
  Mutation: {
    createUser: async (_, { input }) => {
      // Validate input
      const { error } = userSchema.validate(input);
      if (error) {
        throw new UserInputError('Invalid input', { details: error.details });
      }
      
      // Check if email is already taken
      const existingUser = await User.findOne({ email: input.email });
      if (existingUser) {
        throw new UserInputError('Email already taken');
      }
      
      const user = new User(input);
      await user.save();
      return user;
    }
  }
};

Not validating user input can lead to data corruption and security vulnerabilities. Implement input validation for all mutations.

Not Using Query Complexity Analysis

// Anti-pattern: No query complexity analysis
const server = new ApolloServer({
  typeDefs,
  resolvers
});

// Better approach: Implement query complexity analysis
const server = new ApolloServer({
  typeDefs,
  resolvers,
  validationRules: [
    createComplexityLimitRule(1000, {
      scalarCost: 1,
      objectCost: 10,
      listFactor: 10
    })
  ]
});

Without query complexity analysis, clients can send expensive queries that overload your server. Implement query complexity analysis to prevent DoS attacks.

Not Using Proper Error Handling

// Anti-pattern: Poor error handling
const resolvers = {
  Query: {
    user: async (_, { id }) => {
      try {
        return await User.findById(id);
      } catch (error) {
        console.error(error);
        return null; // Silently fails
      }
    }
  }
};

// Better approach: Proper error handling
const resolvers = {
  Query: {
    user: async (_, { id }) => {
      try {
        const user = await User.findById(id);
        if (!user) {
          throw new UserInputError(`User with ID ${id} not found`);
        }
        return user;
      } catch (error) {
        // Log the error for internal tracking
        console.error('Error fetching user:', error);
        
        // Rethrow Apollo errors
        if (error instanceof ApolloError) {
          throw error;
        }
        
        // Convert other errors to appropriate GraphQL errors
        if (error.name === 'CastError') {
          throw new UserInputError(`Invalid ID format: ${id}`);
        }
        
        // For unexpected errors, return a generic message in production
        throw new ApolloError(
          process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production'
            ? 'Internal server error'
            : error.message
        );
      }
    }
  }
};

Poor error handling can lead to security vulnerabilities and a poor developer experience. Implement proper error handling in all resolvers.

Not Using Field-Level Permissions

// Anti-pattern: No field-level permissions
const typeDefs = gql`
  type User {
    id: ID!
    name: String!
    email: String!
    role: String!
    salary: Float
    ssn: String
  }
`;

// Better approach: Implement field-level permissions
const typeDefs = gql`
  type User {
    id: ID!
    name: String!
    email: String!
    role: String!
    salary: Float @auth(requires: ADMIN)
    ssn: String @auth(requires: OWNER)
  }
`;

// Custom directive implementation
const resolvers = {
  User: {
    salary: async (parent, args, context) => {
      if (!context.user || context.user.role !== 'ADMIN') {
        return null;
      }
      return parent.salary;
    },
    ssn: async (parent, args, context) => {
      if (!context.user || (context.user.id !== parent.id && context.user.role !== 'ADMIN')) {
        return null;
      }
      return parent.ssn;
    }
  }
};

Not implementing field-level permissions can lead to sensitive data exposure. Use directives or resolver-level checks to implement field-level permissions.

Not Using Fragments for Client Queries

# Anti-pattern: Duplicated fields across queries
query GetUser {
  user(id: "123") {
    id
    name
    email
    profilePicture
    bio
  }
}

query GetUserPosts {
  user(id: "123") {
    id
    name
    email
    profilePicture
    bio
    posts {
      id
      title
      content
    }
  }
}

# Better approach: Use fragments
fragment UserDetails on User {
  id
  name
  email
  profilePicture
  bio
}

query GetUser {
  user(id: "123") {
    ...UserDetails
  }
}

query GetUserPosts {
  user(id: "123") {
    ...UserDetails
    posts {
      id
      title
      content
    }
  }
}

Duplicating field selections across queries leads to maintenance issues. Use fragments to share field selections across queries.

Not Using Proper Caching

// Anti-pattern: No caching strategy
const server = new ApolloServer({
  typeDefs,
  resolvers
});

// Better approach: Implement caching
const server = new ApolloServer({
  typeDefs,
  resolvers,
  cache: new RedisCache({
    host: 'redis-server',
    port: 6379
  }),
  cacheControl: {
    defaultMaxAge: 60, // 1 minute
    calculateHttpHeaders: true
  }
});

// Type definitions with cache hints
const typeDefs = gql`
  type User @cacheControl(maxAge: 300) {
    id: ID!
    name: String!
    email: String!
    posts: [Post!]! @cacheControl(maxAge: 60)
  }
  
  type Post @cacheControl(maxAge: 1800) {
    id: ID!
    title: String!
    content: String!
  }
`;

Not implementing proper caching can lead to poor performance. Use cache control directives and a caching solution like Redis to improve performance.

Not Using Persisted Queries

// Anti-pattern: Not using persisted queries
// Client sends full query text with each request
const client = new ApolloClient({
  uri: '/graphql'
});

// Better approach: Use persisted queries
// Server setup
const server = new ApolloServer({
  typeDefs,
  resolvers,
  persistedQueries: {
    cache: new RedisCache({
      host: 'redis-server',
      port: 6379
    })
  }
});

// Client setup
const client = new ApolloClient({
  uri: '/graphql',
  cache: new InMemoryCache(),
  link: createPersistedQueryLink().concat(httpLink)
});

Sending full query text with each request increases network traffic. Use persisted queries to reduce network traffic and improve security.

Not Using Code Generation

// Anti-pattern: Manual type definitions
// Client code with manual type definitions
interface User {
  id: string;
  name: string;
  email: string;
}

function fetchUser(id: string): Promise<User> {
  return client.query({
    query: gql`
      query GetUser($id: ID!) {
        user(id: $id) {
          id
          name
          email
        }
      }
    `,
    variables: { id }
  }).then(result => result.data.user);
}

// Better approach: Use code generation
// With GraphQL Code Generator
// codegen.yml
/*
schema: http://localhost:4000/graphql
documents: ./src/**/*.graphql
generates:
  ./src/generated/graphql.ts:
    plugins:
      - typescript
      - typescript-operations
      - typescript-react-apollo
*/

// query.graphql
/*
query GetUser($id: ID!) {
  user(id: $id) {
    id
    name
    email
  }
}
*/

// Client code with generated types
import { useGetUserQuery } from './generated/graphql';

function UserProfile({ id }: { id: string }) {
  const { data, loading, error } = useGetUserQuery({
    variables: { id }
  });
  
  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
  if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>;
  
  return (
    <div>
      <h1>{data.user.name}</h1>
      <p>{data.user.email}</p>
    </div>
  );
}

Manually defining types for GraphQL operations is error-prone. Use code generation tools like GraphQL Code Generator to generate type-safe code from your GraphQL schema and operations.

Not Using Schema Stitching or Federation for Microservices

// Anti-pattern: Monolithic GraphQL schema
const typeDefs = gql`
  type User {
    id: ID!
    name: String!
    orders: [Order!]!
    cart: Cart
    wishlist: [Product!]!
    reviews: [Review!]!
  }
  
  type Product {
    id: ID!
    name: String!
    price: Float!
    inventory: Inventory!
    reviews: [Review!]!
  }
  
  # Many more types for different domains
`;

// Better approach: Use schema federation
// User service
const userTypeDefs = gql`
  type User @key(fields: "id") {
    id: ID!
    name: String!
  }
`;

// Order service
const orderTypeDefs = gql`
  type User @key(fields: "id") @extends {
    id: ID! @external
    orders: [Order!]!
  }
  
  type Order {
    id: ID!
    products: [Product!]!
    total: Float!
  }
  
  type Product @key(fields: "id") {
    id: ID!
    name: String!
    price: Float!
  }
`;

// Product service
const productTypeDefs = gql`
  type Product @key(fields: "id") {
    id: ID!
    name: String!
    price: Float!
    inventory: Inventory!
  }
  
  type Inventory {
    quantity: Int!
    warehouse: String!
  }
`;

// Review service
const reviewTypeDefs = gql`
  type User @key(fields: "id") @extends {
    id: ID! @external
    reviews: [Review!]!
  }
  
  type Product @key(fields: "id") @extends {
    id: ID! @external
    reviews: [Review!]!
  }
  
  type Review {
    id: ID!
    text: String!
    rating: Int!
    user: User!
    product: Product!
  }
`;

A monolithic GraphQL schema becomes hard to maintain as your application grows. Use schema stitching or federation to split your schema across multiple services.

Introduction

Getting Started

Product

Patterns

Integrations

Enterprise

GraphQL